Regulation of distinct caspase-8 functions in retinal ganglion cells and astroglia in experimental glaucoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) expanding from the retina to the brain are primary victims of neurodegeneration in glaucoma, a leading cause of blindness; however, the neighboring astroglia survive the glaucoma-related stress and promote neuroinflammation. In light of diverse functions of caspase-8 in apoptosis, cell survival, and inflammation, this study investigated the importance of caspase-8 in different fates of glaucomatous RGCs and astroglia using two experimental approaches in parallel. In the first approach, cell type-specific responses of RGCs and astroglia to a caspase-8 cleavage-inhibiting pharmacological treatment were studied in rat eyes with or without experimentally induced glaucoma. The second approach utilized an experimental model of glaucoma in mice in which astroglial caspase-8 was conditionally deleted by cre/lox. Findings of these experiments revealed cell type-specific distinct processes that regulate caspase-8 functions in experimental glaucoma, which are involved in inducing the apoptosis of RGCs and promoting the survival and inflammatory responses of astroglia. Deletion of caspase-8 in astroglia protected RGCs against glia-driven inflammatory injury, while the inhibition of caspase-8 cleavage inhibited apoptosis in RGCs themselves. Various caspase-8 functions impacting both RGC apoptosis and astroglia-driven neuroinflammation may suggest the multi-target potential of caspase-8 regulation to provide neuroprotection and immunomodulation in glaucoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".