MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118568968 · doi:10.24330/ieja.852012

$\mathcal{L}$-STABLE RINGS

2021· article· en· W3118568968 on OpenAlex
Ayman M. A. HOROUB, W. K. Nicholson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Electronic Journal of Algebra · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRing (chemistry)CombinatoricsDedekind cutFinite setMathematicsStability (learning theory)PhysicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If $\mathcal{L}(R)$ is a set of left ideals defined in
 any ring $R,$ we say that $R$ is $\mathcal{L}$-stable if it has stable range
 1 relative to the set $\mathcal{L}(R)$. We explore $\mathcal{L}$-stability
 in general, characterize when it passes to related classes of rings, and
 explore which classes of rings are $\mathcal{L}$-stable for some$\mathcal{\ L}.$ Some well known examples of $\mathcal{L}$-stable rings are presented,
 and we show that the Dedekind finite rings are $\mathcal{L}$-stable for a
 suitable $\mathcal{L}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it