MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118582637 · doi:10.1071/rdv33n2ab58

58 Reduced nutrient availability during in vitro culture improves embryo production and morphological quality and alters metabolic status of bovine embryos

2021· article· en· W3118582637 on OpenAlexaff
Érika Cristina dos Santos, Camila Bruna de Lima, Jéssica Ispada, J. V. A. da Silva, H. C. da Rocha, Marcella Pecora Milazzotto

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryo cultureEmbryoOviductBiologyAndrologyEmbryo qualityBovine serum albuminCryopreservationNutrientIn vitroZygoteEmbryogenesisImmunologyBiochemistryEndocrinologyMedicineCell biologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro production (IVP) of embryos is designed to reproduce an environment that resembles the female reproductive tract. However, the system does not perform optimally in terms of quality and embryo production. A major setback lies in the loss of dynamics observed in a static in vitro system, which might affect the availability of substrates that reach the embryo. A reduction in the amount of nutrients in media has been used as an approach to improve IVP (Ermisch et al. 2020 Sci. Rep. 10, 9263; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66019-4). The present study aimed at describing a defined sequential medium (embryonic culture supplementation, ECS) and to investigate the effect of reducing nutrient availability on embryo production, quality, and metabolism. ECS was developed in our laboratory and is a serum-free, salt-based culture medium supplemented with the amount of energy substrates and amino acids found in bovine oviduct (Ov) and uterus (Ut) fluids as previously described (Hugentobler et al. 2007 Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 445–454; https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20607; Hugentobler et al. 2008 Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75, 496–503; https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20760). Embryos were cultured according to the following ECS supplementation: ECS100 (supplemented with 8 mg mL−1 bovine serum albumin and 100% of the energy substrates and amino acids concentrations of the Ov and Ut fluids) and ECS50 (half dilution of ECS100). Bovine oocytes from abattoir ovaries were submitted to IVP using standard protocols. On Day 0 of in vitro culture, presumptive zygotes were randomly divided into groups ECS100-Ov or ECS50-Ov. On Day 4, embryos were respectively transferred to ECS100-Ut and ECS50-Ut. Expanded blastocysts were collected on Day 7 to assess embryo production, morphology (total cell number by Hoescht 33342 staining; inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells by CDX2 immunostaining), and metabolic status (mitochondrial activity and reactive oxygen species content by MitotrackerTM RedCMXRos and CellROXTM Green staining, ThermoFisher Scientific; NADH and FAD+ by autofluorescence). Data were analysed by Student’s t-test (a = 4%). Although cleavage rates were similar between ECS50 and ECS100 (78.13 ± 3.73 vs. 79.70 ± 4.18; P = 0.788), blastocyst rates were positively influenced by the reduction in concentration (28.88 ± 1.74 vs. 16.73 ± 2.41; P = 0.004). This difference likely comes from a blockage at the morula stage in group ECS100, because the conversion from morula to blastocyst was 20% lower in this group (57.73 ± 3.81 vs. 38.15 ± 3.45; P = 0.008). In terms of morphology, blastocysts produced in ECS50 had a higher number of cells (152.4 ± 9.61 vs. 118.3 ± 7.22; P = 0.036), which is explained by the higher number of trophectoderm cells. Finally, metabolic status was affected by nutrient reduction: embryos from ECS50 had higher mitochondrial activity, reactive oxygen species content (P < 0.0001), and lower NADH (P = 0.01), suggesting higher oxidative phosphorylation to produce energy, as expected at this stage. In conclusion, ECS is a functional medium, and a reduced nutrient concentration (ECS50) improves embryo production, morphological quality, and metabolic status of blastocysts, suggesting that culture conditions must be adapted to the in vitro system rather than resembling in vivo conditions. This research was funded by FAPESP (2016/00350-0, 2017/18384-0).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207