Reduced axon caliber in the associative striatum of the <i>Sapap3</i> knockout mouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pathological repetitive behaviors are a common feature of different neuropsychiatric disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder or Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. The Sapap3 knockout mouse ( Sapap3 -KO) is the current reference model used in translational psychiatry to study co-morbid repetitive behaviors, presenting both compulsive-like as well as tic-like behaviors. Consistent with clinical and fundamental research literature relating compulsive-like symptoms to associative cortico-striatal dysfunctions and tic-like symptoms to sensorimotor cortico-striatal dysfunctions, abnormalities comprising both circuits have been described in this mouse model. Findings reported on these mice point towards not only macro-, but also micro-circuitry deficits, both of which can be affected by neuronal structural changes. As such, in the present study, we aimed to investigate structural changes in associative and sensorimotor striatal areas that could affect information conduction. We used AxonDeepSeg, an open-source software to automatically segment and measure myelin thickness and axon caliber, and found that axon caliber, the main contributor for changes in conduction speed, is specifically reduced in the associative but not the sensorimotor striatum of the Sapap3 -KO mouse. This smaller axon caliber in Sapap3 -KO mice is not a general neuronal feature of this region, but specific to a subpopulation of axons with large caliber. These results point to a primary structural deficit in the associative striatum, affecting signal conduction and consequent connectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".