MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118621241 · doi:10.1684/vir.2020.0869

Cellular and antiviral functions of TRIM5α

2020· review· en· W3118621241 on OpenAlexaff
Soumia Khalfi, Natacha Mérindol, Lionel Berthoux

Bibliographic record

VenueVirologie · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrovirusAutophagyULK1BiologyCapsidDownregulation and upregulationFunction (biology)Cell biologyInterferonComputational biologyVirologyVirusGeneticsKinaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this review, we summarize recent advances in the knowledge of the biological functions of human TRIM5α, a cytoplasmic protein mostly known for its antiretroviral functions. In addition to directly targeting retroviral capsid cores, an inhibitory activity called "restriction", TRIM5α senses retroviruses and activates NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways, resulting in the production of type I interferon (IFN-I). The antiviral state resulting from the activation of these pathways includes the upregulation of other restriction factors, and is thought to be important for the control of HIV-1 in some patients. TRIM5α also targets the protease enzyme of several tick-borne flaviviruses, a family of viruses not closely related to retroviruses. In addition to these antiviral functions, TRIM5α promotes autophagy by interacting with key actors of this pathway, such as ULK1 and p62. TRIM5α may function as a selective autophagy receptor in some conditions. Altogether, our understanding of TRIM5α shows its potential for the development of medical applications in viral diseases and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirologieSame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207