MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118632570

Investigating Crosstalk Between DNA Repair and Ribosome Biogenesis

2018· article· en· W3118632570 on OpenAlex
Jeffrey S. McDonald, Erin Kelly, Ute Kothe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueURSCA Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA glycosylasePseudouridineUracil-DNA glycosylaseRibosome biogenesisChemistryRNADNADNA repairBiologyBiochemistryMolecular biologyCell biologyRibosomeUridineGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although typically perceived as separate pathways, DNA repair and ribosome biogenesis have surprisingly been associated with one another by the reported interaction between the human DNA repair enzyme SMUG1 and the pseudouridine synthase dyskerin (DCK1, Cbf5 in yeast). Specifically, this interaction has been shown to excise 5-hydeoxylmethyl deoxyuridine, but not uridine or pseudouridine from RNA molecules. Uracil glycosylases, such as SMUG1, remove damaged bases from DNA, leaving an abasic site open for repair. In particular, uracil glycosylases serve a role in protecting the genome from mutation in the event of cytosine deamination to uracil. Unrepaired U:G mismatches can give rise to transition mutations in replication, resulting in altered gene expression. Dyskerin, a ribosome biogenesis factor, is part of a ribonucleoprotein complex that modifies ribosomal RNA by catalyzing the isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine. The function of dyskerin offers an interesting link to cancer, in which large ribosome quantities are generated within an enlarged nucleolus for rapid protein synthesis. Additionally, RNA pseudouridine synthases have been found to be overexpressed in many cancers and linked to a poor prognosis. Following the overexpression and purification of SMUG1 and Cbf5 (dyskerin homologue), the study looks to establish an electrophoresis and fluorescence based uracil-DNA glycosylase assay utilizing fluorescently labelled DNA molecules and DNA endonucleases. In light of the unclear SMUG1-dyskerin interaction, this fluorescence based assay, will be used to characterize the effect of Cbf5 on SMUG1 activity and vice versa. The affinity of SMUG1 to RNA in the presence and absence of Cbf5 will also be investigated via binding studies, with the aim of testing the hypothesis that dyskerin acts as an RNA tether for SMUG1. Studying these protein-protein and RNA-protein interactions will provide insight into the crosstalk between the two important, and previously thought to be unrelated, cellular pathways of DNA repair and ribosome biogenesis with potential implications for new cancer treatment strategies. *Indicates presenter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it