MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118682277 · doi:10.2514/6.2021-0463

Influence of Carbon Pricing on Regional Aircraft and Route Network Design

2021· article· en· W3118682277 on OpenAlex
Stewart J. Reid, Ruben E. Perez, Peter Jansen, Cees Bil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2021 Forum · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon taxTurbopropEnvironmental economicsBusinessEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasComputer scienceIndustrial organizationAutomotive engineeringEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0463.vid Carbon pricing policies have become the de-facto standard policy of national and multi-national governments in an attempt to mitigate the affects of green house gasses on the environment. To date carbon pricing, either in the form of a carbon tax or an emissions trading scheme, has been implemented by more than 60 countries. Regional aircraft network operations will be challenged by the effect of carbon pricing policies as they increase the fuel price on domestic air travel. A System of Systems analysis is performed to determine the effect of carbon pricing on a regional airline network. This analysis includes route and passenger allocations while considering different combinations of a narrow body jet transport and turboprop aircraft. Trade-offs in network operation were analyzed using different turboprop configurations under three different carbon pricing scenarios for a representative regional network using data from Qantas Airways operating in Australia. While the carbon pricing policies increase the fuel price by up to 72%, results show that optimal allocation of airline resources in the network increase the operational cost and passenger ticket price only by up to 5.81%. This is achieved by changing the fleet compositions by up to 34%. Optimal route network configurations favored smaller but more efficient turboprops over higher capacity turboprops to improve payload range efficiency and reduce fuel burn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it