MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118687947 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3048976

A Privacy-Aware and Traceable Fine-Grained Data Delivery System in Cloud-Assisted Healthcare IIoT

2021· article· en· W3118687947 on OpenAlexaff
Jianfei Sun, Dajiang Chen, Ning Zhang, Guowen Xu, MingJian Tang, Xuyun Nie, Mingsheng Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingComputer securityDelegationEncryptionInformation privacyKey (lock)Security analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging of healthcare Industrial Internet of Things (HealthIIoT) cannot only facilitate high-quality care services for patients but also enable efficient telemedicine platform for healthcare practitioners. However, it faces several fundamental security and privacy challenges, such as secure fine-grained data delivery, privacy preserving keyword-based ciphertext retrieval, malicious key delegation, and efficiency of the system. To combat these issues, we propose a privacy-aware and traceable fine-grained system (PTFS) for secure data delivery in cloud-assisted HealthIIoT. Compared to the existing solutions that only implement some of the preceding features, the proposed solution enables secure fine-grained data delivery, privacy-preserving data retrieval, efficient encryption and decryption operations, and trace of malicious key delegation simultaneously. For security analysis, rigorous proofs of the proposed scheme are provided to prove its security. In addition, extensive simulations and experiments are conducted for performance evaluation, which demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of PTFS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207