On the feasibility of IoT‐based smart meters for earthquake early warning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometer built into a smart meter (SM) has a nominal digital resolution of 16 bits. However, this resolution collapses to 7 bits of information per sample when used in an urban environment. This collapse in resolution limits the sensitivity required to effectively operate the earthquake early warning platform (EEWP). In this study, we evaluate the performance of the MEMS sensor in present SMs with respect to a reference sensor, with a special focus on its poor noise power spectral density (PSD, ). We also explore the general capacity of the SM in an IoT‐based EEWP and provide explicit information regarding the 16‐bit digital MEMS accelerometer. Then, we investigate the functionality of the sensor in the context of event detection in the presence of background vibration. When the value of acceleration root mean square (RMS) exceeds 20 mg, the meter's error decreases to <20%, whereas the peak ground acceleration error decreases to <20% for the peak value greater than ~70 mg. The MEMS sensor is unreliable for motions with a peak acceleration of less than 148 mg or those with an RMS value less than 46 mg. However, we note that SMs exhibit reasonable amplitude and phase coherence for frequencies above 1 Hz with respect to the reference accelerometer. To enhance the sensitivity, averaging 1000 coherent accelerometer observations enhances the digital resolution to 14 bits, which allows the efficient usage of the network bandwidth. Since the accelerometer is used as an anti‐tampering mechanism, the SM is similar to a tiltmeter. Therefore, it is necessary to reconfigure SMs for early warning systems. Despite the challenges, the use of SM for an IoT‐based EEWP is technically feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".