MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118697386 · doi:10.4000/ifha.11067

Jan-Robert Schmidt, Will das Kind sein Wohl? Eine Untersuchung über Kindeswille und Kindeswohl im Sorge- und Umgangsrecht nach Scheidungen von 1946 bis 2016

2020· article· de· W3118697386 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp Glahé

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2020
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Health Sciences Research
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« C’est Goethe qui disait : ‘J’aime mieux une injustice qu’un désordre.’ Parole inhumaine et odieuse derrière quoi toujours se réfugient les bourreaux et les mauvais juges, parole malfaisante et imbécile, car la justice provoque toujours ce désordre que M. Goethe, soucieux de sa tranquillité, redoutait tant », écrivait le scénariste et journaliste Henri Jeanson (François Caradec (dir.), Henri Jeanson en verve, 1971, p.14). En effet, il n’est pas rare que des jugements tout en respectant les ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicMedical and Health Sciences ResearchFrench-language works237,207