MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118708701 · doi:10.31083/jomh.2021.001

A survey of adult men who underwent circumcision in childhood for pathological phimosis

2021· article· en· W3118708701 on OpenAlex
Harriet Corbett, Kirsty Nweze, Ewoma Ukeleghe, Caroline Sanders

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Men s Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLichen sclerosusForeskinPathologicalSurgeryGynecologyDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Pathological phimosis in childhood typically results in circumcision. Long-term follow-up data for men circumcised in childhood are lacking. This study sought long-term data regarding satisfaction with circumcision and voiding symptoms from men who had childhood circumcision between 1989 and 2010. Methods: Following ethical approval, a postal survey was sent to males > 17 years who underwent circumcision at an age < 16 years for pathological phimosis. Results: The survey was sent to 177 men, 23 completed surveys were returned [19 histology proven Lichen Sclerosus [LS, BXO], 4 chronic balanitis]. Mean age at circumcision was 9.7 years [range 3-15], at survey 23.5 years [18-37]. Seven [all > 9 years] remembered the decision for circumcision. Four warranted urologist review as adults, three required surgery for voiding symptoms and one still performs structure therapy; all had LS. When asked which treatment option[s] they would have considered; ten of them chose circumcision, nine of them chose preputioplasty, eight of them chose topical creams [two of them chose all three options, one man chose both foreskin preserving options]. Eight agreed with the statement ''Having a circumcision in childhood or adolescence had an impact on my adult life''; this was positive in two men but negative in five men-they wouldn't have chosen circumcision. Conclusions: The response rate to the survey was low, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions. However, even in this limited sample, not all men would choose childhood circumcision for pathological phimosis, data supporting the need for larger studies of alternative treatment options. In addition, some men circumcised for childhood LS had significant voiding difficulties in adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it