Optical Code Construction of 2D Spectral/Spatial BIBD Codes for SAC-OCDMA Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optical code division multiple access (OCDMA) shows limitations in terms of the inefficient bandwidth utilization and low spectral density with one-dimensional (1D) codes. To overcome these limitations, a novel design is presented using a two dimensional (2D) spectral/spatial multiwavelength coding scheme. The proposed code is constructed using a 1D balanced incomplete block design (BIBD) technique. Theoretical and analytical results indicate that the proposed code provided improvement in the number of simultaneous users, code construction, and cross-correlation and minimized noise. Moreover, the bandwidth requirements can be minimized, and it can provide flexibility in addressing code sequences. Finally, results were compared with existing spectral-spatial 2D codes such as diagonal eigenvalue unity (DEU) and 2D diluted perfect difference (DPD). It was observed that the 2D-BIBD code fulfilled optical transmission needs with minimum effective source power (Psr = −27.5 dBm) when compared to 2D-DEU (−26.5 dBm) and 2D-DPD (−25.5 dBm) codes. Overall, our results suggested that the performance of BER for the proposed code was 72% and 22% higher than the existing 2D-DPD and 2D-DEU codes, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".