MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Selection-valuable barley samples of the VIR collection in terms of adaptability, productivity and grain quality

2020· article· en· W3118731885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
С. А. Герасимов

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivityAdaptabilityGrain yieldGeographyYield (engineering)AgricultureAgronomyEcologyBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the research is to identify promising samples of spring barley from the VIR collection in terms of yield, parameters of the adaptive capacity of individual productivity elements and grain quality for use in creating a new breeding material adapted to the extreme conditions of Eastern Siberia. When studying the VIR collection in the conditions of Eastern Siberia for the first time, barley samples were identified according to the parameters of the adaptive ability of individual elements of productivity and yield, grain quality indicators, which are involved in crosses with local varieties. With the participation of these samples, 100 hybrid combinations were created. The studies were carried out in 2014-2017 on the experimental field of the Krasnoyarsk Research Institute of Agriculture, located in Eastern Siberia on ordinary low-power black soils, according to generally accepted methods. Agrometeorological conditions during the years of research were contrasting. It has been established that the highest grain productivity was formed by the variety Abalak (Krasnoyarsk Territory, Tyumen Region), Vaughn C.I. 11367 (k-17835, USA), Kindred (k-18048, USA), Codac (k-30874, Canada), Etienne (k-30875, Canada), Diamond (k-29192, Canada), AC Albright (k- 30601, Canada), Ubagan (k-30776, Chelyabinsk region.), Bagrets (k-30988, Sverdlovsk region), Talan (k-46502) and Tanay (Novosibirsk region), Abalak (Krasnoyarsk Territory, Tyumen region), AC Albright (k-30601, Canada), Cirstin (k- 29988, Germany), Talan (k-46502, Novosibirskaya region), Tarsky 3 (k-30719, Omsk region). In the selection of varieties of an intensive type, samples of North America, Scandinavia, Germany, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan and some regions of Russia were of interest. To increase the amount of protein in grain during crop farming, samples from Germany, Yugoslavia, Dagestan, Altai Territory and Chelyabinsk Region had an advantage. Some samples from Canada, Chelyabinsk, Novosibirsk and Altai Regions were identified based on the gross collection of protein per unit area. Samples from Canada, Finland, Sweden, as well as Novosibirsk and Omsk Regions were characterized by high grain quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)Same topicAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementFrench-language works237,207