MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Utilidad de los test cognoscitivos breves para detectar la demencia en población mexicana

2020· article· es· W3118814296 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diana Angélica Romo-Galindo, Eduardo Padilla-Moya

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivos de Neurociencias · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDementiaCognitive impairmentPsychologyGerontologyMedicineArtCognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los test cognoscitivos breves o de cribado (TCB) son instrumentos que se han utilizado para detectar a las personas con demencia, entre los más utilizados a nivel internacional son el Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), el Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), el Seven Minute Screen Test (7MS) y el Memory Impairment Screen (MIS).El objetivo de esta revisión fue analizar la utilidad de los TCB para detectar la demencia en población mexicana, se realizó una búsqueda de artículos en bases de datos y sitios web (PubMed, EBSCO y Google Scholar). El MMSE ha sido el instrumento más utilizado en México para detectar la demencia en comparación con el MoCA y el MIS, no se encontraron estudios relevantes acerca del 7MT. Sin embargo, el MoCA ha sido más útil para detectar el DCL y la demencia en comparación con el MMSE y el MIS. Cada instrumento presenta limitaciones y aspectos a considerar cuando son administrados para detectar la demencia como la edad y la escolaridad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivos de NeurocienciasSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207