MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118861877

고고자료로 본 신라의 강릉지역 진출과 루트 구성

2009· article· ko· W3118861877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue대구사학 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Coastal Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchaeologyHistoryAncient history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examined archaeological resources that discuss how Silla entered the Gangneung area, the coastal region along the East Sea that has been excavated most actively. Silla expanded its territories while organizing the its system as an ancient state and acquired several independent townships in various regions, stretching its forces to the East Sea area faster than any other ancient states of the time. In particular, many early relics and heritages of Silla have been found in Gangneung, the center of the East Sea area. Many archaeological resources prove these circumstances of that time and provide brief texts that are valuable for our interpretation of historical facts. In this respect, it was possible for me to examine these resources to answer my question as to why early relics and heritages of Silla are found in the Gangneung area. Based on my research on Silla`s advancement into the Gangneung area, I have acquired the following results: First, when did Silla first stretched its forces to the Gangneung area? I determined that Silla first entered the Gangneung area at the fourth quarter of the 4th Century. According to historical texts, Gangneung was already under Silla`s rule in the 42nd year(397) of King Namul. Archaeological resources also support this fact as long-legged vessels at Kwandong University Museum and in Hasi-dong have been the earliest vessels of Silla found in the Gangneung area(fourth quarter of the 4th Century). Second, why did Silla aim to advance into the Gangneung area so early in its history? The Yeongdong area in the Era of the Three Empires was the gateway to advanced cultures of the north. As Gangneung was the center of the Yeongdong area, Silla needed to gain control of this area to exchange with more advanced empires, such as China and Goguryeo. As Yeguk, the primitive state that had been ruling Gangneung was not very prosperous and the East Sea route had already been formed, it was relatively easy for Silla to stretch into the Gangneung Area. Territorial expansion was essential, of course. Third, which route did Silla mostly take to march toward the Gangneung area? I considered two types of routes: land route and sea route. As the land route required Silla to head northwest through Gyeongju-Yeongcheon-Euiseong-Andong-Yeongju-Jeongseon and east to Samcheok and Gangneung, Silla used the northern sea route through Pohang-Yeongdeok-Uljin-Samcheok-Gangneung-Yangyang-Goseong-Anbyeon-Iwon. This sea route was situated along the coastline and was geographically open to transportation. I also suggested a secondary route through which Silla might have headed toward Pohang from the Gyeongju basin to conquer Yeongilman Bay and head to Gangneung on ships. Also, it seems that Silla headed to Ulleungdo, which is right off the shores of Gangneung, to conquer Usanguk and gain full control of the East Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it