MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118896827 · doi:10.5206/mf.v6i1.13428

De La Confession anonyme au film Benvenuta : recadrage d’une œuvre controversée

2020· article· fr· W3118896827 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Carmen Cristea

Bibliographic record

VenueMouvances Francophones · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtConfession (law)PhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’adaptation cinématographique de La confession anonyme, œuvre controversée de l’écrivaine belge Suzanne Lilar, a permis de jeter une lumière nouvelle sur ce texte, tout en mettant en valeur la poétique du double et du trompe-l’œil qui sous-tend l’œuvre entière de l’écrivaine. En réalisant le film Benvenuta, André Delvaux relève non seulement le défi des « doubles sens » et du double discours qui caractérisent ce texte, mais il mène une réflexion qui va au-delà du thème principal du livre – la relation entre l’amour et le sacré – pour questionner les liens entre la vie et la fiction et le processus créateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.018
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouvances FrancophonesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207