MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118896827 · doi:10.5206/mf.v6i1.13428

De La Confession anonyme au film Benvenuta : recadrage d’une œuvre controversée

2020· article· fr· W3118896827 on OpenAlex
Carmen Cristea

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouvances Francophones · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtConfession (law)PhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’adaptation cinématographique de La confession anonyme, œuvre controversée de l’écrivaine belge Suzanne Lilar, a permis de jeter une lumière nouvelle sur ce texte, tout en mettant en valeur la poétique du double et du trompe-l’œil qui sous-tend l’œuvre entière de l’écrivaine. En réalisant le film Benvenuta, André Delvaux relève non seulement le défi des « doubles sens » et du double discours qui caractérisent ce texte, mais il mène une réflexion qui va au-delà du thème principal du livre – la relation entre l’amour et le sacré – pour questionner les liens entre la vie et la fiction et le processus créateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it