MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3119053719 · doi:10.1101/2021.01.03.425165

Testosterone induces a conditioned place preference to the nest of a monogamous mouse under field conditions

2021· preprint· en· W3119053719 on OpenAlexaff
Radmila Petric, Matina C. Kalcounis‐Rueppell, Catherine A. Marler

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPeromyscusNest (protein structural motif)Testosterone (patch)ZoologyBiologyConditioned place preferenceSexual behaviorPsychologyEndocrinologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Transient increases in testosterone (T-pulses) occur after social interactions in males of various vertebrate species, but the functions of T-pulses are poorly understood. Under laboratory conditions, the rewarding nature of T-pulses induces conditioned place preferences (CPPs), but what are the effects in a complex field environment? We present the first evidence that T-pulses administered to males at their nest site in the wild increased time spent at the nest regardless of pup presence in the monogamous, biparental, and territorial California mouse ( Peromyscus californicus ). Female partners of the T-males, in turn, spent less time at the nest. Independent of treatment, mice produced more ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) when alone, but T-mice produced more USVs than controls. T-males produced USVs with a smaller bandwidth that likely traveled farther. Our combined results provide compelling evidence that T-pulses can significantly shift the behavioral focus and location of individuals in a complex field setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior→French-language works237,207→