Research on the Prosperity of Private Economy Based on Fuzzy Theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The private economy is the driving force and energy to promote the sustainable and healthy development of the economy and society. To ensure the sustainability and stability of the private economy, it is of great significance to try to analyze and investigate the detection and early warning of the private economy for the economic management departments to formulate corresponding macro-control policies in a timely and accurate manner. Taking Guangzhou for an example, this paper constructs a monitoring index system based on the data obtained from a questionnaire survey of 88 private enterprises in the 11 districts of Guangzhou, combined with the current situation of the private economy. In this monitoring index system, the analytic hierarchy process is used to obtain the weight of each monitoring index, and the fuzzy mathematics theory is used to establish a monitoring model of the economic prosperity of the private enterprises. It turns out that the private economy in Guangzhou is increasingly developing currently. The Economic management departments can adjust economic policies in accordance with the current index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it