Three-dimensional cyclic behavior of saturated clays: comparison between undrained and partly drained conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cyclic response of subgrade clays under traffic loadings is likely to be partly drained rather than undrained, and the traffic-induced dynamic stress field is three-dimensional rather than axisymmetric. To compare the three-dimensional deformation behaviors of saturated clays between partly drained and undrained conditions, a large number of cyclic true triaxial tests were conducted. Experimental results show that a partly drained condition leads to a remarkable increase of permanent major principal strain ([Formula: see text]) compared to an undrained condition, and the differences of [Formula: see text] between the two drainage conditions are affected greatly by the factors of cyclic stress ratio (CSR), overconsolidation ratio (OCR), and coefficient of cyclic intermediate principal stress (b cyc ). The increase of b cyc induces a linear reduction of [Formula: see text] in an undrained condition, while it causes an increase first followed by a decrease of [Formula: see text] in a partly drained condition. The clays undergo stiffness softening and hardening in partly drained and undrained conditions, respectively, and the effects of b cyc and CSR on the stiffness evolution are very different between the two drainage conditions. The mechanism of the complex [Formula: see text] and resilient modulus behaviors in a three-dimensional state and partly drained condition is further discussed. In addition, two different empirical models are employed to predict [Formula: see text] in partly drained and undrained conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".