MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119160153 · doi:10.25047/j-dinamika.v5i2.1518

Pembentukan dan Pelatihan Kader Pendamping Ibu Hamil Resiko Tinggi Sebagai Upaya “GEBRAK“ (Gerakan Bersama Amankan Kehamilan) Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sumberpucung

2020· article· id· W3119160153 on OpenAlexaff
Senditya Indah Mayasari, Nicky Danur Jayanti, Patemah Patemah

Bibliographic record

VenueJ-Dinamika Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyArtPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Usaha mempercepat keberhasilan penurunan Angka Kematian Ibu (AKI) dan Angka Kematian Bayi (AKB) disamping faktor akses dan pelayanan, peran serta lintas sektor khususnya yang terkait dengan upaya kesehatan ibu adalah meningkatkan kemitraan lintas sektor yang dituangkan dalam suatu kegiatan pendampingan ibu hamil resiko tinggi oleh kader yang dilaksanakan di kabupaten Malang yang dikenal dengan program GEBRAK (Gerakan Amankan Kehamilan dan Persalinan). Di Desa Ternyang tercatat periode Januari – Maret 2019 terdapat 78 ibu hamil dengan kehamilan resiko tinggi (KRT) dan 9 ibu hamil dengan kehamilan resiko sangat tinggi (KRST). Tujuan dari kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah terbentuk Kader Pendamping Ibu Hamil Resiko Tinggi di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sumberpucung. Luaran pada kegiatan ini adalah terbentuknya kader pendamping ibu hamil resiko tinggi, adanya kegiatan rutin kader pendamping ibu hamil resiko tinggi, pencatatan dan pelaporan adanya ibu hamil beresiko tinggi dapat terdokumentasi dengan baik, adanya upaya preventif dan promotif dalam rangka meningkatkan kesehatan ibu dan anak, pengadaan media sarana dan prasarana modul/panduan dan leaflet kehamilan resiko tinggi. Pelaksanaan kegiatan ini dilalukan selama 2 bulan (Juni-Juli 2019) dengan mencapai hasil terbentuknya keder pendamping ibu hamil resiko tinggi sebanyak 12 kader dari 6 pos posyandu dan terlaksananya pelatihan kader oleh tim pengabdi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJ-Dinamika Jurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207