<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> gene expression during fermentation of Pinot noir wines at industrially relevant scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During a wine fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae transforms grape must through metabolic activities that generate ethanol and other compounds. Thousands of genes change expression over the course of a wine fermentation to allow S. cerevisiae to adapt to and dominate the fermentation environment. Investigations into these gene expression patterns have previously revealed genes that underlie cellular adaptation to the grape must and wine environment involving metabolic specialization and ethanol tolerance. However, the vast majority of studies detailing gene expression patterns have occurred in controlled environments that do not recapitulate the biological and chemical complexity of fermentations performed at production scale. Here, we present an analysis of the S. cerevisiae RC212 gene expression program across 40 pilot-scale fermentations (150 liters) using Pinot noir grapes from 10 California vineyards across two vintages. We observe a core gene expression program across all fermentations irrespective of vintage similar to that of laboratory fermentations, in addition to novel gene expression patterns likely related to the presence of non- Saccharomyces microorganisms and oxygen availability during fermentation. These gene expression patterns, both common and diverse, provide insight into Saccharomyces cerevisiae biology critical to fermentation outcomes at industry-relevant scales. Importance This study characterized Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC212 gene expression during Pinot noir fermentation at pilot scale (150 liters) using production-relevant conditions. The reported gene expression patterns of RC212 is generally similar to that observed in laboratory fermentation conditions, but also contains gene expression signatures related to yeast-environment interactions found in a production setting (e.g., presence of non- Saccharomyces microorganisms). Key genes and pathways highlighted by this work remain under-characterized, raising the need for further research to understand the roles of these genes and their impact on industrial wine fermentation outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".