MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119260152 · doi:10.1145/3430767

RHUPS

2021· article· en· W3119260152 on OpenAlexaff
Yoonji Baek, Unil Yun, Heonho Kim, Hyoju Nam, Hyunsoo Kim, Jerry Chun‐Wei Lin, Bay Vo, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityData miningDatabaseSliding window protocolData streamData stream miningWindow (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Databases that deal with the real world have various characteristics. New data is continuously inserted over time without limiting the length of the database, and a variety of information about the items constituting the database is contained. Recently generated data has a greater influence than the previously generated data. These are called the time-sensitive non-binary stream databases, and they include databases such as web-server click data, market sales data, data from sensor networks, and network traffic measurement. Many high utility pattern mining and stream pattern mining methods have been proposed so far. However, they have a limitation that they are not suitable to analyze these databases, because they find valid patterns by analyzing a database with only some of the features described above. Therefore, knowledge-based software about how to find meaningful information efficiently by analyzing databases with these characteristics is required. In this article, we propose an intelligent information system that calculates the influence of the insertion time of each batch in a large-scale stream database by applying the sliding window model and mines recent high utility patterns without generating candidate patterns. In addition, a novel list-based data structure is suggested for a fast and efficient management of the time-sensitive stream databases. Moreover, our technique is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms through various experiments using real datasets and synthetic datasets. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms the previously proposed methods in terms of runtime, memory usage, and scalability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5990.527

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and TechnologySame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207