MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119276036 · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00624-1

A (quasi-)polynomial time heuristic algorithm for synthesizing T-depth optimal circuits

2022· article· lv· W3119276036 on OpenAlexafffund
Vlad Gheorghiu, Michele Mosca, Priyanka Mukhopadhyay

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Quantum Information · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigate the problem of synthesizing T-depth optimal quantum circuits for exactly implementable unitaries over the Clifford+T gate set. We construct a subset, $${{\mathbb{V}}}_{n}$$ Vn , of T-depth 1 unitaries. T-depth-optimal decomposition of unitaryUis $${e}^{i\phi }\left({\prod }_{i}{V}_{i}\right)C$$ eiϕ∏iViC , $${V}_{i}\in {{\mathbb{V}}}_{n}$$ Vi∈Vn ,Cis Clifford and $$| {{\mathbb{V}}}_{n}| \,\le \,n\cdot {2}^{5.6n}$$ ∣Vn∣≤n⋅25.6n . We use nested meet-in-the-middle technique to synthesize provably depth-optimal and T-depth-optimal circuits. For the latter, we achieve space and time complexity $$O({({4}^{{n}^{2}})}^{\lceil d/c\rceil })$$ O((4n2)⌈d/c⌉) and $$O({({4}^{{n}^{2}})}^{(c-1)\lceil d/c\rceil })$$ O((4n2)(c−1)⌈d/c⌉) respectively (dis the minimum T-depth,c ≥ 2 a constant). The previous best algorithm had complexity $$O({({3}^{n}\cdot {2}^{k{n}^{2}})}^{\lceil \frac{d}{2}\rceil }\cdot {2}^{k{n}^{2}})$$ O((3n⋅2kn2)⌈d2⌉⋅2kn2) (k > 2.5 a constant). We design a more efficient algorithm with space and time complexity poly(n, 25.6n, d) (or $${{{\rm{poly}}}}({n}^{\log n},{2}^{5.6n},d)$$ poly(nlogn,25.6n,d) with weaker assumptions). The claimed efficiency, optimality depends on conjectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Quantum InformationSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207