Mapping forest leaf area density from multiview terrestrial lidar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Terrestrial lidar data are known to be useful for estimating the three‐dimensional (3D) distribution of leaf area in forests. This type of product holds great potential for modelling canopy reflectance and light interception to study the links between structure and function. However, little is currently known about its potential and limits in dense forests. Higher leaf area density implies that more laser pulses emitted by the ground‐based instrument are intercepted in lower canopy levels, and the implications of such occlusion effects on radiative transfer simulations are unknown. Occlusion effects can be minimized by increasing the number of locations lidar data is acquired from; how many locations are required for a forest with a given structure? This paper aims to address these knowledge gaps. We acquired terrestrial lidar data using a very high density of scanning positions (5 m between positions) over four dense forest 60 m × 60 m plots along a structural gradient. Occlusion effects were quantified, and the 3D distribution of leaf area density was mapped using voxels (cubic volumes) for four different scan densities (one original and three downsampled). The voxel arrays were then input into a radiative transfer model to simulate bidirectional reflectance factors and vertical fraction of absorbed radiation. We found that the summation of leaf area estimates for all voxels within the plot provided leaf area index (LAI) values close to LAI values estimated using traditional methods at each site. Occluded areas occurred mostly at the top of bottom heavy canopies. Radiative transfer simulations suggest that modelling small scale (<1 m) bidirectional reflectance factors (BRF) and light interception requires the highest scan position density used (5 m between scan positions), particularly at bottom heavy sites, and that 10 m between scan positions can be used for plot scale BRF simulations in forests with foliage density and vertical profiles similar to those tested here. This work establishes some initial guidelines for establishing terrestrial lidar survey protocols for mapping leaf area density in forests. The leaf area density voxel arrays derived are among the most accurate plot‐level 3D characterizations of foliage arrangement produced to date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".