MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119330218 · doi:10.3390/app11020668

Multi-Model Identification of HVAC System

2021· article· en· W3119330218 on OpenAlexafffund
Yousef Alipouri, Lexuan Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMitacs
KeywordsHVACComputer scienceCluster analysisAir conditioningVentilation (architecture)System identificationProcess (computing)Identification (biology)EngineeringData miningArtificial intelligenceMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is a crucial system for maintaining acceptable air quality and keeping the building and its occupants healthy. There are some challenges in controlling and identifying this system as it commonly operates in different operation conditions. Furthermore, various types of un-controlled sources disturb the steady operations. In addition, an HVAC system is an inherently nonlinear system and varies with time. As a result, conventional methods are not successful in identifying and controlling this system. This paper proposes a new multi-model approach in which the clustering and regression steps are performed simultaneously to tackle this problem. Cost functions of clustering and regression steps are combined and optimized using an iterative algorithm. After identifying the local models, a gap metric based approach is used to develop a global model of the process. The proposed approach is tested on a simulated ventilation unit system and real-world dataset. The results show the performance of the proposed method of identifying the ventilation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207