MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119670508 · doi:10.1071/rdv33n2ab97

97 Function of species-specific OCT4 reporter system during porcine embryo development

2021· article· en· W3119670508 on OpenAlexaff
Seong‐Hyop Kim, Mi Kyeong Lee, Kwang‐Hwan Choi, D.-K. Lee, Jong‐Nam Oh, Gyeong Cheol Choe, Jinsol Jeong, C.-K. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhancerReporter geneEmbryoBiologyGreen fluorescent proteinEmbryogenesisMolecular biologyEmbryonic stem cellCell biologyTransfectionChemistryCell cultureGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study examined the activity and function of pig OCT4 (POU5F1) enhancer in porcine early embryo development. OCT4 is one of the master regulators for the pluripotency of early mammalian embryonic development and embryonic stem cells. It has two regulatory elements: distal enhancer (DE) and proximal enhancer (PE) in the upstream regulatory region. They are activated under different conditions such as naïve and primed. It is known that two enhancers are activated to produce OCT4 simultaneously or sequentially depending on the state of pluripotency. Many porcine OCT4 upstream region-based reporter systems have been reported because this is a necessary part of studying porcine-specific pluripotency. However, the porcine-specific OCT4 reporter system has never been transfected and functionally tested during porcine early embryo development. We performed functional tests of the previously established porcine-specific OCT4 reporter system in the early embryo development stage. Porcine embryos were micro-injected with the pOCT4-ΔPE-eGFP (DE-GFP) containing a distal enhancer and core promoter and pOCT4-ΔDE-DsRed2 (PE-RFP) containing a proximal enhancer and core promoter. They were cultured in PZM-3 at 39°C in a humidified atmosphere, 5% CO2, and 5% O2 for 168 h. Fifty of the 100 embryos were injected with OCT4 reporter system as treatment groups and the other 50 were not injected (control groups). We analysed mRNA and protein expression of GFP and RFP using quantitative real-time PCR and confocal microscopy by developmental stages. The introduced reporter system could function beginning with the 4-cell stage. The expression of GFP and RFP was observed simultaneously in the early embryonic development stage up to blastocyst, indicating that porcine OCT4 was produced by distal and proximal enhancers, unlike mouse Oct4 expression, which was only controlled by the distal enhancer during early embryo development. Therefore, the mechanisms and functions of distal and proximal enhancers of porcine OCT4 were different from those of the mouse. This is similar to results of the previous experiment using porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells, which suggest that porcine OCT4 is expressed by two enhancers and in a stage-specific manner during reprogramming and that pigs do not use only one enhancer in pluripotent states, but two enhancers at the same time, and there is only a difference in degree. This work showed that the porcine OCT4 reporter system enables non-destructive analysis during early embryo development and it could be applied to study species-specific pluripotency and to help the establishment of naïve embryonic stem cells in the pig. This work was supported by the BK21 Plus Program, the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2019R1C1C1004514), the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through the Development of High Value-Added Food Technology Program funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (MAFRA; 118042-03-3-HD020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207