MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119686755 · doi:10.82396/cjcd.v19i2.3159

Managing Emergent Knowledge: Addressing the Competency Expectations of Biomedical Employers

2020· article· en· W3119686755 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ryan A. Kloop, Derrick E. Rancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomedical and Engineering Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical educationCurriculumStakeholderGovernment (linguistics)FeelingPublic relationsPsychologyMedicinePolitical sciencePedagogySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biomedical graduate students face an uncertain job market. A significant number of these graduates are sub or un-employed and work in areas not requiring a university degree. For those graduates experiencing this, feeling they have no control over their careers, future sub-employment has become a significant contributor to the rise in mental illness among this cohort (Frank & Hou, 2018). The government of Alberta has begun to communicate expectations that university education and training should be tied to labor market expectations, so this study surveyed and interviewed 92 biomedical hiring managers in western Canada. When asked which non-technical skills they felt graduate degree holders typically are missing, 85 percent of respondents indicated that project management and/or customer engagement were the skills that were lacking in recent graduate students in this field of study. The responses received from these leaders in the Biomedical field who were surveyed suggest that a skills awareness gap is preventing employers from understanding the full value of graduates because these graduates do not articulate the professional skills that they gain in graduate school throughout the hiring process or demonstrate their competencies in the workplace. Accordingly, these shortfalls can be addressed by introducing project management and knowledge translation awareness into curricula. Demand for project management expertise is rising in the biomedical field. Greater awareness and exposure to project management and customer engagement through knowledge translation will help prepare students for the transition into their professional field of work, while also making them more productive in their educational program. Likewise, stakeholder (i.e., customers) interaction such as students presenting their research to stakeholders can promote knowledge translation while introducing students to potential employers earlier in their training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)Same topicBiomedical and Engineering EducationFrench-language works237,207