MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119687918 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3051646

Blind System Identification in Noise Using a Dynamic-Based Estimator

2021· article· en· W3119687918 on OpenAlexaff
Sumona Mukhopadhyay, Boyuan Li, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundEstimatorAlgorithmAutoregressive modelMean squared errorIndependent and identically distributed random variablesMathematicsSystem identificationComputer scienceUpper and lower boundsNoise (video)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)ChaoticEstimation theoryStatisticsArtificial intelligenceRandom variableData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we consider the problem of blind system identification in noise driven by an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) non-Gaussian signal generated from a deterministic nonlinear chaotic system. A new estimator for the phase space volume (PSV) which is a dynamic-based property of chaos is derived using the maximum likelihood formulation. This novel estimator of PSV is denoted as the maximum likelihood phase space volume (ML-PSV). The Cramér Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) of the ML-PSV estimator has also been derived. We have shown that the mean square error of the ML-PSV estimate gradually approaches its CRLB asymptotically. An algorithm is formulated that applies the ML-PSV estimator as an objective function in the task of blind system identification of autoregressive (AR) and moving average (MA) models. The proposed technique is shown to improve blind identification performance at low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when the system is driven by both chaotic numeric and symbolic signals. The efficiency of our proposed method is compared with conventional blind identification methods through simulations. Our technique is further validated through experimental evaluation based on a software defined radio (SDR). Results show that the ML-PSV method outperforms the existing blind identification methods producing estimates at a low SNR of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\le20$ </tex-math></inline-formula> dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207