Congenital Kyphosis: Progressive Correction With an Instrumented Posterior Epiphysiodesis: A Preliminary Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Congenital kyphosis is a rare condition. In this case series we sought to identify the outcomes and complications of posterior instrumented fusion and the resultant epiphysiodesis effect in uniplanar congenital kyphosis in pediatric patients. METHOD: Pediatric patients were included if treated for a uniplanar congenital kyphotic deformity treated with posterior instrumented spinal fusion between October 2006 and August 2017, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patients were excluded if a coronal deformity >10 degrees was present. RESULTS: Six patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 3.6 years. The mean kyphotic deformity before surgery was 49.7 degrees. All patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion with autogenous iliac crest graft and a cast or brace postoperatively. One patient showed a loss of motor evoked potential on prone positioning which returned to normal on supine positioning. No patient showed any postoperative neurological deficits. One patient was diagnosed with a wound infection which was successfully treated with oral antibiotics.By a follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 2.2 to 10.9 y) there was no failure of instrumentation. An epiphysiodesis effect (a difference of ≥5 degrees in the kyphotic deformity measured between the immediate postoperative and final follow-up lateral whole spine XR) of 16.2 degrees (range, 7.2 to 30.9 degrees) was seen in 5 patients. The mean annual epiphysiodesis effect was 2.7 degrees (95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.1 degrees). No kyphosis proximal to the instrumentation was observed for the duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Posterior instrumented fusion and epiphysiodesis is safe and effective. The epiphysiodesis effect occurs in 5/6 of cases, and our data suggests that the procedure is associated with an acceptable blood loss and a low incidence of neurological complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".