MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119735107 · doi:10.1364/oe.415049

Object-dependent spatial resolution of the reflection-mode terahertz solid immersion microscopy

2021· article· en· W3119735107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersMegagrantsRussian Science FoundationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOpticsRefractive indexTerahertz radiationMaterials scienceTotal internal reflectionWavelengthMicroscopeMicroscopyNear-field scanning optical microscopeOptical microscopeScanning electron microscopePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terahertz (THz) solid immersion microscopy is a novel promising THz imaging modality that overcomes the Abbe diffraction limit. In our prior work, an original reflection-mode THz solid immersion microscope system with the resolution of 0.15 λ (in free space) was demonstrated and used for imaging of soft biological tissues. In this paper, a numerical analysis, using the finite-difference time-domain technique, and an experimental study, using a set of objects with distinct refractive indexes, were performed in order to uncover, for the first time, the object-dependent spatial resolution of the THz solid immersion microscopy. Our findings revealed that the system resolution remains strongly sub-wavelength 0.15–0.4 λ for the wide range of sample refractive indices n = 1.0–5.0 and absorption coefficients α = 0–400 cm −1 (by power). Considering these findings, two distinct regimes of the THz solid immersion microscopy were identified. First is the total internal reflection regime that takes place when the sample refractive index is relatively low, while the sub-wavelength resolution is enabled by both the evanescent and ordinary reflected waves at the interface between a high-refractive-index material and an imaged object. Second is the ordinary reflection regime that occurs when the sample refractive index is high enough, so that there is no more total internal reflection at the interface, while only the ordinary reflected waves inside a high-refractive-index material are responsible for the sub-wavelength resolution. The resultant conclusions are general and can be applied for analysis of solid immersion lenses operating in other spectral ranges, such as visible and infrared, given linear nature of the Maxwell’s equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it