MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119781256 · doi:10.1093/imaman/dpaa028

Bayesian spatio-temporal modelling and prediction of areal demands for ambulance services

2020· article· en· W3119781256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Management Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov chain Monte CarloBayesian inferenceBayesian probabilityFlexibility (engineering)InferenceService (business)Data miningOperations researchStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Careful planning of an ambulance service is critical to reduce response times to emergency calls and make assistance more effective. However, the demand for emergency services is highly variable, and good prediction of the number of future emergency calls, and their spatial and temporal distribution, is challenging. In this work, we propose a Bayesian approach to predict the number of emergency calls in future time periods for each zone of the served territory. The number of calls is described by a generalized linear mixed effects model, and inference, in terms of posterior predictive distributions, is obtained through Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Our approach is applied in a large city in Canada. The paper demonstrates that using a model for areal data provides good results in terms of predictive accuracy and allows flexibility in accounting for the main features of the dataset. Moreover, it shows the computational efficiency of the approach despite the huge dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it