MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119782924 · doi:10.1007/s10455-022-09853-1

Deformations of $$\mathrm {G}_2$$-instantons on nearly $$\mathrm {G}_2$$ manifolds

2022· preprint· en· W3119782924 on OpenAlexaff
Ragini Singhal

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Global Analysis and Geometry · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstantonSpinorConnection (principal bundle)InfinitesimalDirac operatorMathematical physicsSpace (punctuation)HomogeneousPure mathematicsMathematicsKernel (algebra)Deformation (meteorology)PhysicsOperator (biology)Dirac (video compression format)Mathematical analysisCombinatoricsGeometryQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study the deformation theory of $$\mathrm {G}_2$$ G2 -instantons on nearly $$\mathrm {G}_2$$ G2 manifolds. There is a one-to-one correspondence between nearly parallel $$\mathrm {G}_2$$ G2 structures and real Killing spinors; thus, the deformation theory can be formulated in terms of spinors and Dirac operators. We prove that the space of infinitesimal deformations of an instanton is isomorphic to the kernel of an elliptic operator. Using this formulation we prove that abelian instantons are rigid. Then we apply our results to describe the deformation space of the characteristic connection on the four normal homogeneous nearly $$\mathrm {G}_2$$ G2 manifolds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Global Analysis and GeometrySame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207