MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119789362 · doi:10.5639/gabij.2021.1002.008

Variation in the prices of oncology medicines across Europe and the implications for the future

2021· article· en· W3119789362 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Godman, Steven Simoens, Amanj Kurdi, Gisbert Selke, John Yfantopoulos, Andrew Hill, Jolanta Gulbinovič, Antony P. Martin, Angela Timoney, Dzintars Gotham, Janet Wale, Tomasz Bochenek, Iva Selke Krulichová, Eleonora Allocati, Iris Hoxha, Admir Malaj, A. Nachtnebel, Wouter Hamelinck, Zornitza Mitkova, Guenka Petrova, Ott Laius, Catherine Sermet, Irene Langner, Roberta Joppi, Elita Poplavska, Ieva Greičiūtė-Kuprijanov, Patricia Vella Bonanno, JF Hans Piepenbrink, Vincent de Valk, Robert Plisko, Magdałene Władysiuk, Vanda Marković‐Peković, Ileana Mardare, Tanja Novaković, Mark Parker, Jurij Fürst, D Tomek, Katarína Baňasová, Mercè Obach Cortadellas, Corrine Zara, Caridad Pontes, Maria Juhasz-Haverinen, Peter Skiöld, Stuart McTaggart, Durhane Wong‐Rieger, Stephen Campbell, Ruaraidh Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueGenerics and Biosimilars Initiative Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Canadian institutionsCanadiana.org
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReimbursementPopulationMedicinePer capitaGross domestic productErlotinibLife expectancyHealth careEconomicsCancerInternal medicineEconomic growthEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction/Objectives: Health authorities are facing increasing challenges to the sustainability of their healthcare systems because of the growing expenditures on medicines, including new, high-priced oncology medicines, and changes in disease prevalence in their ageing populations. Medicine prices in European countries are greatly affected by the ability to negotiate reasonable prices. Concerns have been expressed that prices of patented medicines do not fall sufficiently after the introduction of lower-cost generic oncology medicines. The objective of this study was to examine the associations over time in selected European countries between the prices of oral oncology medicines, population size, and gross domestic product (GDP) before and after the introduction of generic versions. Evidence of periodic reassessments of the price, value, and place in treatment of these medicines was also looked for. The goal of this review was to stimulate debate about possible improvements in approaches to reimbursement negotiations. Methodology: Analysis was performed of reimbursed prices of three oral oncology medicines (imatinib, erlotinib and fludarabine) between 2013 and 2017 across Europe. Correlations were explored between GDP, population size, and prices. Findings were compared with previous research regarding prices of generic oral oncology medicines. Results: The prices of imatinib, erlotinib and fludarabine varied among European countries, and there was limited price erosion over time in the absence of generics. There appeared to be no correlation between population size and price, but higher prices of on-patent oral cancer medicines were seen among countries with higher GDP per capita. Conclusion: Limited price erosion for patented medicines contributed to increases in oncology medicine budgets across the region. There was also a concerning lack of evidence re-assessments of the price, value, and place in treatment of patented oncology medicines following the loss of patent protection of standard medicines. The use of such proactive re-assessments in negotiating tactics might positively impact global expenditures for oncology medicines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenerics and Biosimilars Initiative JournalSame topicEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerFrench-language works237,207