A Multilane Tracking Algorithm Using IPDA with Intensity Feature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detection of multiple lane markings on road surfaces is an important aspect of autonomous vehicles. Although a number of approaches have been proposed to detect lanes, detecting multiple lane markings, particularly across a large number of frames and under varying lighting conditions, in a consistent manner is still a challenging problem. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for detecting multiple lanes across a large number of frames and under various lighting conditions. Instead of resorting to the conventional approach of processing each frame to detect lanes, we treat the overall problem as a multitarget tracking problem across space and time using the integrated probabilistic data association filter (IPDAF) as our basis filter. We use the intensity of the pixels as an augmented feature to correctly group multiple lane markings using the Hough transform. By representing these extracted lane markings as splines, we then identify a set of control points, which becomes a set of targets to be tracked over a period of time, and thus across a large number of frames. We evaluate our approach on two different fronts, covering both model- and machine-learning-based approaches, using two different datasets, namely the Caltech and TuSimple lane detection datasets, respectively. When tested against model-based approach, the proposed approach can offer as much as 5%, 12%, and 3% improvements on the true positive, false positive, and false positives per frame rates compared to the best alternative approach, respectively. When compared against a state-of-the-art machine learning technique, particularly against a supervised learning method, the proposed approach offers 57%, 31%, 4%, and 9× improvements on the false positive, false negative, accuracy, and frame rates. Furthemore, the proposed approach retains the explainability, or in other words, the cause of actions of the proposed approach can easily be understood or explained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".