MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W311987058

Body, Interrupted: Textual Montage, Traumatized Bodies, and the De-Disciplining of Knowledge. (Research Articles/Rapports De Recherche)

2002· article· en· W311987058 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julia Emberley

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMeaning (existential)Context (archaeology)SociologyRepresentation (politics)Articulation (sociology)ConstitutionArtPhilosophyEpistemologyHistoryPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work examines the production of cultural knowledge through alternative writing practices such as textual montage. lam interested in demonstrating the experimental value of textual montage for the representation of personal and embodied knowledge, The first section outlines the meaning of this textual strategy for de-disciplining knowledge and the mind/body dichotomy. The second part is a demonstration of how this particular writing technique can be used to deal with trauma in the context of the medico-industrial complex, its use of medical imaging and the outmoded Cartesian logic of the mind/body split in the constitution of the patient/doctor relationship. Ce travail examine la production du savoir culturel travers des pratiques alternatives d'ecriture tel que le montage textuel. Je m'interesse demontrer la valeur experimentale du montage textuel en vue de la representation du savoir personnel et corporel. La premiere section delimite la signification de cette strategie textuelle afin de de-discipliner le savoir et la dichotomie esprit / corps. La seconde partie demontre comment cette technique d'ecriture en particulier peut etre employee afin de se confronter au traumatisme dans le contexte du complexe medico-industriel, l'emploi qu'il fait des images medicales et la logique cartesienne demodee de la division entre l'esprit et le corps dans la constitution du rapport entre patient et medecin. ********** In my writing practices I turn, repeatedly, to an exploration and articulation of traumatized bodies, bodies which have been experienced some form of violence. I define violence broadly to include representational violence, the violence of the gaze and the violence of being rendered invisible; or epistemic violence, the violence of knowledge and the violence of a sanctioned ignorance that keeps knowledge from people or mystifies it and renders it inaccessible. Representational violence and epistemic violence are discontinuous from, however mutually related to, feminist interrogations of domestic violence and sexual abuse; economic violence such as the brutality of poverty; and technological warfare, or the violence of technology and mechanization in the military and medico-industrial complexes, for example. Body, interrupted is a metaphor for the irreducibility of this traumatized body, a body too often anatomized into animal, human, mechanical, and commodified parts. It is my contention that the traumatized body is now writing its history and will not be silenced. It asks, what are the rights of my body, the wounded body, the dismembered body, the disabled body? Answering these questions requires a different organization or practice of knowledge. It also requires different representational strategies. The book has somehow to be adapted to the body, and at a venture one would say that women's books should be shorter, more concentrated, than those of men, and framed so that they do not need long hours of steady and uninterrupted work. For interruptions there will always be. Again, the nerves that feed the brain would seem to differ in men and women, and if you are going to make them work their best and hardest, you must find out what treatment suits them--whether theses hours of lectures, for instance, which the monks devised, presumably, hundreds of years ago, suit them--what alternations of work and rest they need, interpreting rest not as doing nothing but as doing something but something that is different; and what should that difference be? (Woolf, 1981, p. 78). (1) Criticalspace: the metaphor and the material I am acutely aware that it is the business of ideas that I traffic in but I want to do something different with them. I also want to shift the lines of intake and output from that conventional space of academic knowledge that I occupy--no, that is my occupation--and turn toward other material sources--disparate materials that constitute the flotsam and jetsam of post-and not-so-post-industrial worlds. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.027
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.562
GPT teacher head0.593
Teacher spread0.031 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207