MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119893443 · doi:10.2514/6.2021-0562

Dynamic response analysis of the helicopter blades with non-uniform structural properties

2021· article· en· W3119893443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2021 Forum · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodNonlinear systemBlade (archaeology)Boundary value problemBeam (structure)Helicopter rotorHingeStructural engineeringDisplacement (psychology)Quadratic equationDifferential equationPartial differential equationMathematical analysisState variableMathematicsRotor (electric)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsGeometryMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0562.vid In this study, a new general Finite Element Method (FEM) with variable order is utilized to solve the nonlinear first-order partial differential equations presented by Hodges [1] for analyzing initially curved and twisted anisotropic rotating beams subjected to arbitrary articulated boundary conditions. It is particularly attractive for the simulation of the non-linear structural dynamic response of hinged and hingeless helicopter blades with uneven structural properties distributions, especially those with sharp variations from section to section. A geometrically-exact and fully intrinsic theory is used here for dynamics of composite blades undergoing large deformation. The formulation is said implicit because the beam displacement and rotation variables are not included in the state vector form. Although the equations are geometrically exact, the highest degree of nonlinearity is quadratic and they do not have infinite-degree nonlinearities found in other methods. Application of method to specific examples is performed. The effect of presence of flexible joints between the hub and blade is investigated using two hinges in the flapwise and lead-lag directions, respectively. For verification purposes, the linearized beam Campbell diagrams are obtained and compared with those produced by the commercial program FLIGHTLAB for the same rotor blade. In addition, experimental tests are used to validate the proposed method. Nonlinear time domain dynamic responses are also obtained and validated against FLIGHTLAB. Based on the results and the performed comparisons for two different types of connections between the blade and hub, good accuracy of the FEM algorithm is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it