Model‐Informed Pediatric Dose Selection for Dapagliflozin by Incorporating Developmental Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This analysis reports a quantitative modeling and simulation approach for oral dapagliflozin, a primarily uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)-metabolized human sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 selective inhibitor. A mechanistic dapagliflozin physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed using in vitro metabolism and clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data and verified for context of use (e.g., exposure predictions in pediatric subjects aged 1 month to 18 years). Dapagliflozin exposure is challenging to predict in pediatric populations owing to differences in UGT1A9 ontogeny maturation and paucity of clinical PK data in younger age groups. Based on the exposure-response relationship of dapagliflozin, twofold acceptance criteria were applied between model-predicted and observed drug exposures and PK parameters (area under the curve and maximum drug concentration) in various scenarios, including monotherapy in healthy adults (single/multiple dose), monotherapy in hepatically or renally impaired patients, and drug-drug interactions with UGT1A9 modulators, such as mefenamic acid and rifampin. The PBPK model captured the observed exposure within twofold of the observed monotherapy data in adults and adolescents and in special population. As a guide to determining dosing regimens in pediatric studies, the verified PBPK model, along with UGT enzyme ontogeny maturation understanding, was used for predictions of dapagliflozin monotherapy exposures in pediatric subjects aged 1 month to 18 years that best matched exposure in adult patients with a 10-mg single dose of dapagliflozin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".