Magnetic hysteresis of magnetite, pyrrhotite and hematite at high temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The magnetic properties of iron-bearing minerals at above-ambient temperatures control their magnetic expression at depth in the Earth and other planets, as well as the permanent memory they retain as thermoremanence or thermochemical remanence when brought to the surface and cooled. This paper reports magnetic hysteresis parameters measured at temperatures up to the Curie point TC for natural pyrrhotite and hematite and for suites of sized magnetites, both natural and synthesized. Domain structure changes can be inferred from the ratio of saturation remanence Mrs to saturation magnetization Ms. In almost all magnetites and pyrrhotites studied, Mrs decreases more rapidly with increasing measurement temperature T than Ms, indicating thermal unblocking or vortex development in single-domain grains and addition or remobilization of domain walls at high T in multidomain grains. During cooling of a rock, iron minerals might then denucleate domains or vortices. Coercive force Hc, a measure of stability against changing magnetic fields, also decreases with increasing measurement T, usually at a rate similar to that of Mrs, but often retains a finite value near the Curie point.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".