Long-level intramedullary spinal cord astrocytoma complicated with spine scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Long-level intramedullary astrocytomas complicated with spine scoliosis are rare. Surgical treatment of such tumors becomes more complicated and challenging when spinal scoliosis is present. However, studies describing the treatment of long segmental intramedullary spinal cord astrocytomas complicated with severe spine scoliosis have been rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION: Two cases of long-level intramedullary astrocytomas complicated with severe spine scoliosis were surgically treated with one-stage operation of tumor resection and scoliosis correction in this report. Case 1: A 16-year-old boy presented to our hospital with a five-month progressive paresthesia, weakness of the left lower limb, and a long-time abnormal body appearance. MRI showed a T4-T12 intramedullary tumor combined with spinal scoliosis. Case 2: A 14-year-old boy presented at our service with a 6-year history of visible spine scoliosis and a 1-year progressive motor disability of bilateral lower limbs. Spine MRI indicated a long-level abnormal syringomyelia signal from C4 to L1 and there was irregular enhancement after intravenous contrast medium administration at C7-T2 and T9-T12 level. DISCUSSION: We performed a laminectomy over the whole length of the tumor and corrected the scoliosis with trans-pedicle screws. The patients exhibited a long-time tumor free with largely neurological function preservation. One-stage operation did not generate severe short- or long-term complications. The correction of the scoliosis prevented the progression of the spinal deformity and facilitated the recovery of normal life. CONCLUSION: This case report demonstrates that the one-stage resection of long-level intramedullary astrocytoma and correction of the complicated scoliosis might be a feasible option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".