MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119952878 · doi:10.18280/ts.370605

Projected Wirtinger Gradient Descent for Digital Waves Reconstruction

2020· article· en· W3119952878 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Suhui Liu, Lelai Shi, Weiyu Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)ThresholdingMatrix (chemical analysis)Convergence (economics)Gradient descentMathematicsFrequency domainStochastic gradient descentFistLow-rank approximationDomain (mathematical analysis)Compressed sensingComputer scienceHankel matrixArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematical analysisArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work attempts to recover digital signals from a few stochastic samples in time domain. The target signal is the linear combination of one-dimensional complex sine components with R different but continuous frequencies. These frequencies control the continuous values in the domain of normalized frequency [0, 1), contrary to the previous research into compressed sensing. To recover the target signal, the problem was transformed into the completion of a low-rank structured matrix, drawing on the linear property of the Hankel matrix. Based on the completion of the structured matrix, the authors put forward a feasible-point algorithm, analyzed its convergence, and speeded up the convergence with the fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding (FIST) algorithm. The initial algorithm and the speed up strategy were proved effective through repeated numerical simulations. The research results shed new lights on the signal recovery in various fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207