MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119975253 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04035

Aqueous CO <sub>2</sub> Reduction by a Re(bipyridine)-polypyrrole Film Deposited on Colloid-Imprinted Carbon

2021· article· en· W3119975253 on OpenAlexafffund
Janina Willkomm, Sara Bouzidi, Erwan Bertin, Viola Birss, Warren E. Piers

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMaterials scienceCatalysisPolymerizationNanoporousChemical engineeringPolypyrroleInorganic chemistryAqueous solutionElectrolysisElectrolyteCarbon fibersElectrocatalystElectrochemistry2,2'-BipyridineColloidPolymerElectrodeChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, we report a [Re(bipyridine)]-carbon hybrid material for efficient and selective CO2 to CO conversion in water. The Re catalyst was incorporated into a nanoporous colloid-imprinted carbon (CIC) powder by an electrochemical polymerization method. Uniform [Re(bipyridine)]-containing polymer films were formed on the carbon surface, where the catalyst-polymer loading could be controlled by varying the polymerization parameters. Thorough pre- and post-catalysis characterization confirmed the integrity of the [Re(bpy)] CO2 reduction catalyst. CIC|poly[Re] electrodes reduced CO2 to CO in 0.5 M CO2-saturated KHCO3 electrolyte solution at Eappl. = −0.66 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (η = 550 mV), with initial Faradaic efficiencies for CO formation (FECO) between 88 and 100%. Higher catalyst loadings generally yielded higher FECO and better long-term stability under catalytic conditions, producing CO and maintaining selectivity of above 70% for a period of at least 24 h for the hybrid material with the highest [Re(bipyridine)] polymer loading. While electrochemical analyses suggested some electron and mass transport issues on shorter timescales, these were not confirmed in long-term electrolysis. Our work highlights the great applicability of (electro)polymerization techniques in combination with nanoporous CIC to prepare hybrid materials for energy conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207