Proximate Determinants of Fertility Intentions in Tehran, Iran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The success of any pronatalist population policies relies on improving the understanding of immediate determinants of fertility intentions (attitudes to childbearing, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control) among married young couples. This research is based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the data from the 2012 Tehran Survey of Fertility Intentions (n= 2267). The results show that more than half of young married adults in Tehran intend to have no more children. The multivariate analysis indicate that individuals who view childbearing as being detrimental to their personal life (e.g., economic living condition, marital relationships and life satisfaction), feel less normative pressure from very close peer groups (parents, friends, and neighbors) to have a/another child, and believe their childbearing decision is not contingent on the presence of economic resources required for childbearing, are more likely to want no (more) children or to be unsure rather than to want a/another child. Other findings show that access to the government incentives to increase fertility has different effects on fertility intentions of socio-economically various subgroups of young married couples, which should be considered by policy makers developing pronatalist population policies of the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".