When is an obscurin variant pathogenic? The impact of Arg4344Gln and Arg4444Trp variants on protein–protein interactions and protein stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obscurin is a giant muscle protein that connects the sarcomere with the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and has poorly understood structural and signalling functions. Increasingly, obscurin variants are implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. The Arg4344Gln variant (R4344Q) in obscurin domain Ig58, initially discovered in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, has been reported to reduce binding to titin domains Z8-Z9, impairing obscurin's Z-disc localization. An R4344Q knock-in mouse developed a cardiomyopathy-like phenotype with abnormal Ca2+-handling and arrhythmias, which were attributed to an enhanced affinity of a putative interaction between obscurin Ig58 and phospholamban (PLN) due to the R4344Q variant. However, the R4344Q variant is found in 15% of African Americans, arguing against its pathogenicity. To resolve this apparent paradox, we quantified the influence of the R4344Q variant (alongside another potentially pathogenic variant: Arg4444Trp (R4444W)) on binding to titin Z8-Z9, novex-3 and PLN using pull-down assays and microscale thermophoresis and characterized the influence on domain stability using differential scanning fluorimetry. We found no changes in titin binding and thermostability for both variants and modestly increased affinities of PLN for R4344Q and R4444W. While we could not confirm the novex-3/obscurin interaction, the PLN/obscurin interaction relies on the transmembrane region of PLN and is not reproducible in mammalian cells, suggesting it is an in vitro artefact. Without clear clinical evidence for disease involvement, we advise against classifying these obscurin variants as pathogenic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".