MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combining Refractive Solid Immersion Lens and Pulsed Laser Induced Techniques for Effective Defect Localization on Microprocessors

2008· article· en· W3120081796 on OpenAlex
A.C.T. Quah, S. H. Goh, Venkat Krishnan Ravikumar, S.L. Phoa, V. Narang, J.M. Chin, C.M. Chua, J.C.H. Phang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLock-in amplifierLaserAmplifierImmersion (mathematics)OpticsLens (geology)Sensitivity (control systems)Image resolutionOptoelectronicsMicroprocessorComputer scienceElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringPhysicsCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The spatial resolution and sensitivity of laser induced techniques are significantly enhanced by combining refractive solid immersion lens technology and laser pulsing with lock-in detection algorithm. Laser pulsing and lock-in detection enhances the detection sensitivity and removes the ‘tail’ artifacts due to amplifier ac-coupling response. Three case studies on microprocessor devices with different failure modes are presented to show that the enhancements made a difference between successful and unsuccessful defect localization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it