MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120165284 · doi:10.1177/2043820620986396

Gesturing toward the common and the desperation: Climate geopoetics’ potential

2021· article· en· W3120165284 on OpenAlex
Maleea Acker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues in Human Geography · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryClimate changeReading (process)GestureAestheticsState (computer science)HistoryLiteratureSociologyLinguisticsArtPhilosophyComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This commentary responds to Magrane’s accomplished article on climate geopoetics. I first ask whether Magrane’s reading could go wider to include some prominent poets who have addressed climate and lyric poetry in recent decades. I then suggest a connection between climate geopoetics and lyric philosophy, and posit the ability of poetry, through lyric’s ability to forfeit the individual self and to gesture toward something common, a universal emotion or state. Finally, I suggest that Magrane unleash his words so that they might match the desperate times in which humans find themselves. This response then ends with a climate geopoetics poem of my own.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it