MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120309885 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-23482/v1

Household Wealth Inequalities in High Body Mass Index among Women of Childbearing Age: Evidence from the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey

2020· preprint· en· W3120309885 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Dankwah, Priscilla Koduah-Benewaa

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBody mass indexDemographyOverweightSocioeconomic statusMarital statusConfidence intervalObesityMedicineInequalityOdds ratioLogistic regressionGerontologyPopulationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ghana is currently experiencing higher body mass index (BMI), that is overweight and obesity, among reproductive-aged women. However, understanding the role of socioeconomic status in the high BMI among this cohort has not been studied extensively in Ghana and the few existing studies in the country have generated mixed results. This study aims to examine household wealth inequalities in high BMI among Ghanaian women of childbearing age. Methods The 2014 Ghana Demography and Health Survey (GDHS) dataset was analyzed. A univariable and multivariable regression model with a logit link function was specified to ascertain the effect of household wealth inequalities in high BMI among Ghanaian women. Furthermore, concentration index and curve were used to measure the degree of household wealth inequalities in high BMI among reproductive aged women. Results This study found high BMI prevalence of 35.9 percent with significant household wealth-related inequalities (Concentration index = 0.24, 95%CI (confidence interval): 0.22–0.26). The analysis revealed that high BMI is concentrated among wealthier women. Compared to poorest women, poorer (AOR (Adjusted odds ratio) = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.66–2.85), middle-class (AOR = 4.44, 95%CI: 3.24–6.09), richer (AOR = 7.75, 95%CI: 5.53–10.86) and richest (AOR = 11.03, 95%CI: 8.07–15.06) women were more likely to have high BMI. On top of that, socioeconomic characteristics including age, marital status, and education of reproductive-aged women were significantly associated with high BMI. Conclusions The research revealed that a woman from a wealthier household had higher likelihood of having high BMI relative to those from a less wealthy household. Also, women who were educated and cohabiting, formerly or currently married had an increased risk of having high BMI. This observation suggests targeted policy interventions and programs that promote healthy body weight to reduce the high BMI prevalence among women of childbearing age in Ghana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207