MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120310312 · doi:10.1002/9781119507444.ch1

Large Igneous Province Record Through Time and Implications for Secular Environmental Changes and Geological Time‐Scale Boundaries

2021· other· en· W3120310312 on OpenAlexaff
Richard E. Ernst, David P.G. Bond, Shuan‐Hong Zhang, Kenneth L. Buchan, Stephen E. Grasby, Nasrrddine Youbi, Hafida El Bilali, Andrey Bekker, Luc S. Doucet

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaCarleton University
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsPhanerozoicPrecambrianGeologyIgneous rockPaleontologySedimentary rockGeologic recordEarth scienceEnvironmental changeExtinction eventScale (ratio)Geologic time scalePhysical geographyGeographyCenozoicClimate changeOceanographyCartographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An emerging consensus suggests that large igneous provinces (LIPs) are a significant driver of dramatic global environmental and biological changes, including several Phanerozoic mass extinctions, leading to plausible links with geological time scale (GTS) boundaries. LIP-induced environmental changes are now being identified in the Precambrian record, suggesting potential for the use of LIPs to define natural pre-Phanerozoic GTS boundaries. There is now opportunity for more systematic integration of the sedimentary and LIP records. Here we provide maps of generalized LIP distributions through time, and a compilation of LIP ages, approximate areal extents, and potential links (both robust and speculative) with secular environmental changes and GTS boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations144
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical monographSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207