MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120579005 · doi:10.1007/s00464-020-08216-w

The first modified Delphi consensus statement on sleeve gastrectomy

2021· article· en· W3120579005 on OpenAlexaff
Kamal Mahawar, Islam Omar, Rishi Singhal, Sandeep Aggarwal, Mustafa Allouch, Salman Al‐Sabah, Luigi Angrisani, Faruq Badiuddin, José M. Balibrea, Ahmad Bashir, Estuardo Behrens, Kiron Bhatia, Laurent Biertho, L. Ulas Biter, J. Dargent, Maurizio De Luca, Eric J. DeMaria, Mohamed Hayssam Elfawal, Martin Fried, Khaled Gawdat, Yitka Graham, Miguel F. Herrera, Jacqués Himpens, Farah A Hussain, Kazunori Kasama, David Kerrigan, Lilian Kow, Jon Kristinsson, Marina Kurian, Ronald S. L. Liem, Rami Lutfi, Vinod Menon, Karl Miller, Patrick Noe͏̈l, Орал Оспанов, Mehmet Mahir Özmen, Ralph Peterli, Jaime Ponce, Gerhard Prager, Arun Prasad, P. Raj, Nelson Ramírez Rodríguez, Raúl J. Rosenthal, Nasser Sakran, Jorge Santos, Asim Shabbir, Scott A. Shikora, Peter Small, Craig J. Taylor, Cunchuan Wang, Rudolf A. Weiner, Mariusz Wyleżoł, Wah Yang, Ali Aminian

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgical Endoscopy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsensus conferenceMedicineSleeve gastrectomyDelphi methodGeneral surgeryFamily medicineDelphiVotingSurgeryWeight lossLawGastric bypassInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.089
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.132
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0890.132
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSurgical EndoscopySame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207