Synthesis and coordination of a neutral phosphaguanidine and comparison of its basicity with a guanidine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A phosphaguanidine [Me2NC(PPh2)=N i Pr], the analogous guanidine [Me2NC(NPh2)=N i Pr], and their hydrochloride (HCl) salts were prepared to study the influence of substituting a phosphorus atom for a nitrogen atom on the basicity of the two compounds and the bonding in their conjugate acids. The pK a values of both HCl salts were measured in acetonitrile by NMR titration. Surprisingly, the substitution of P for N has essentially no effect on basicity even though the geometry at that atom is changed. The presence of phenyl substituents in the protonated guanidine reduces the resonance in the CN3 core, whereas poor orbital overlap between P and C reduces the resonance in the N2CP core of the protonated phosphaguanidine. The neutral phosphaguanidine binds to a Cu(I) halide through both the Nimine and the P, which suggested that the basic N atom on the bound ligand may have little utility as a Brønsted base. Fortunately, however, a Cu(I) halide complex of the protonated phosphaguanidine is stable. Thus, the tendency of the basic N to bind to metals does not proscribe it serving as a metal-proximate Brønsted base.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".