MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120695505 · doi:10.1177/1475921720985437

Simultaneous pixel-level concrete defect detection and grouping using a fully convolutional model

2021· article· en· W3120695505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePixelConvolutional neural networkMinimum bounding boxPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionDeep learningIntersection (aeronautics)Set (abstract data type)SegmentationImage (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning techniques have attracted significant attention in the field of visual inspection of civil infrastructure systems recently. Currently, most deep learning-based visual inspection techniques utilize a convolutional neural network to recognize surface defects either by detecting a bounding box of each defect or classifying all pixels on an image without distinguishing between different defect instances. These outputs cannot be directly used for acquiring the geometric properties of each individual defect in an image, thus hindering the development of fully automated structural assessment techniques. In this study, a novel fully convolutional model is proposed for simultaneously detecting and grouping the image pixels for each individual defect on an image. The proposed model integrates an optimized mask subnet with a box-level detection network, where the former outputs a set of position-sensitive score maps for pixel-level defect detection and the latter predicts a bounding box for each defect to group the detected pixels. An image dataset containing three common types of concrete defects, crack, spalling and exposed rebar, is used for training and testing of the model. Results demonstrate that the proposed model is robust to various defect sizes and shapes and can achieve a mask-level mean average precision ( mAP) of 82.4% and a mean intersection over union ( mIoU) of 75.5%, with a processing speed of about 10 FPS at input image size of 576 × 576 when tested on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 GPU. Its performance is compared with the state-of-the-art instance segmentation network Mask R-CNN and the semantic segmentation network U-Net. The comparative studies show that the proposed model has a distinct defect boundary delineation capability and outperforms the Mask R-CNN and the U-Net in both accuracy and speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it